Tuesday, June 7, 2011

enrique iglesias wallpaper

enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias :: [ SirfJatt
  • enrique iglesias :: [ SirfJatt



  • hnordberg
    June 18th, 2005, 12:58 PM
    I like the top one the way it is. It is moody and the motion blur of the bird just adds to the feeling. Great capture.

    With the rainbow, I think I may have tried to get an anchor for the foreground. Such as the yellow flower/bush in the lower right. I often find myself shooting with the camera at ground level. But it is a fine picture, nevertheless.

    The bird shots are good. I would probably cut out some of the top of the last one.

    Cheers
    - Henrik





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias
  • enrique iglesias



  • felix31
    01-17 01:43 PM
    Here is what we did..

    It was back in 2000. We filed my husbands taxes as single. Then we filed W7 and mailed it. Some 3 months later I received ITIN. With that we filed amended return adding me and that was it. Everything is straightforward since then.





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias wallpaper.
  • enrique iglesias wallpaper.



  • RayP
    12-08 03:13 AM
    Thanks for your response. Good to hear that I can file while I am outside the US.
    Meanwhile, I was wondering if it expires due to (assume) my neglect... does that create issues or can I apply at a later date... this is just in case I forget !! Sorry !!





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias Wallpapers
  • Enrique Iglesias Wallpapers



  • Joey Foley
    May 16th, 2005, 07:58 PM
    So far, I think I'm going to pick four to send in.
    Man, I wish that dust of dirt or whatever it is wasn't on there.

    I might give it a other try.:confused:



    more...


    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias Looking Down
  • Enrique Iglesias Looking Down



  • gc_bulgaria
    10-09 04:18 PM
    http://www.immigration-law.com/

    10/08/2007: I-140 Portability After 180 Days of 485 Filing and Service Centers Standard Procedure of Review and Adjudication


    When there is a retrogression of visa numbers and anticipated long delays in 485 adjudication due to the massive July VB fiasco 485 filings, it is anticipated that there will be a substantial number of 485 applicants who may have to change employment along the way, either voluntarily or involuntarily, under AC 21 Section 106(c) provision. Accordingly, whether one reports the change of employment proactively or not, one should learn the internal review and adjudication procedures within the Service Center which are adopted by the adjudicators in adjudicating such I-485 applications.
    The good material to review on this procedure is the USCIS Standard Operating Procedure for the adjudicators. The SOP states that "If the alien is using the portability provisions of AC21 106(c), the adjudicator must determine that both the ported labor certification and the ported I-140 are still valid under the current employer, especially in regards to the continual payment of the prevailing wage, similar occupation classification, and the employer’s ability to pay the prevailing wage."

    (1) Prevailing Wage Payment: The AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer pays the prevailing wage or higher wage for portability. However, the adjudicators review the wage as part of their determination of "continuing validity" of the ported certified labor certification application and I-140 petition. When the applicant stays with the same employer without changing employer, payment of wage less than the prevailing wage should not present any serious issue inasmuch as the employer establishes that the employer was financially able to pay the prevailing wage and is continuously able to pay the prevailing wage until the green card is approved. However, when there is a change of employer who pays less than the prevailing wage, there is no clear-cut rule with reference to this issue. Payment of less than prevailing wage thus potentially can raise two issues when there is a change of employer. One is the adjudicator's argument that there is no continuing validity of the labor certification or I-140 petition. The other is the argument that different wage reflects that the labor certification job and the new job with the new employer are two different occupational classifications.

    (2) Similar occupational classification issue: The similarity of the two positions involves not the "jobs" but "occupational classification." Accordingly, the old and new positions do not necessarily have to match exactly in every details, especially specific skill sets. Currently, the USCIS is looking up the Labor Department SOC/OES classifications of occupations. When the two jobs fall under the same occupational classification in the DOL occupational definitions, the two jobs are generally considered "similar" occupational classification. As long as the two jobs belong to a similar occupational classification, the applicant can work for the new employer anywhere in the United States. There is no physical location restrictions.

    (3) Employer's financial ability to pay the wage: Again, AC 21 106(c) does not specifically require that the new employer must prove that the new employer has and will have a financial ability to pay the prevailing wage. However, the adjudicators appear to review the portability case considering the new employer's ability to pay as well as part of review of continuing vality of labor certification and I-140 petition.
    Remember that when there is a portability issue, two things can ensue. If one proactively reports the eligibility of portability meeting all the foregoing requirment, the adjudicators are likely to decide the pending I-485 application on the merit. However, if the 485 applicants do not report proactively change of employment and the USCIS somehow obtains information of the alien's change of employment, for instance, by employer's report of termination of employment or withdrawal of I-140 petition or substitution of alien beneficiary, then 485 applicants are likely to be served a notice of intent to deny I-485 applications or in most cases, the adjudicator transfers the I-485 file to the local district office for interview.

    In AC 21 106(c) portability situation, the adjudicators also review the issue of the continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition involving the original employer, and are likely to raise similar issues which are described above. However, when the alien ports with the "approved" I-140 petition with a copy of the last paycheck and W-2, the adjudicators rarely revisit the original employer's foregoing issues in determining the 140 portability issue. The issues are raised when the alien ports before the I-140 petition is approved. Under the Yates Memorandum, when the alien ports before I-140 petition is approved, the alien has a burden of proof that the I-140 petition was approvable. Accordingly, inasmuch as I-140 petition was approvable and the alien ports after 180 days of I-485 filing, even if the original employer withdraws the I-140 petition, the pending I-485 will not be affected. Yates Memorandum indicates that in such a circumstance, the adjudicator should adjudicate the pending I-140 petition and if finds approvable, then recognizes 106(c) portability and continues to adjudicate the pending I-485 application. Without doubt, in the foregoing situation, the adjudicator will intensively and carefully review the issue of continuing validity of labor certification and I-140 petition issues which are specified above, particularly the employer's financial ability to pay the wage, and the applicant will have to overcome tremendous hurdles to deal with the challenges by the USCIS. Accordingly, people should not port before I-140 petition is approved unless they are assured that the original employer will continuously cooperate and support his/her green card process.





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias Wallpaper
  • Enrique Iglesias Wallpaper



  • amulchandra
    01-14 12:55 PM
    Congratulations.

    One quick question . Your PD (from your profile) is not current. Did you upgarde to EB2?

    Thank you

    Amul



    more...


    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique-Iglesias-Wallpapers-1
  • Enrique-Iglesias-Wallpapers-1



  • vsrinir
    11-25 09:04 AM
    http://www.ilw.com/immigdaily/digest/2008,1125.shtm


    The Detroit Free Press quotes Senate Majority Leader Reid "On immigration, there's been an agreement between [Mr.] Obama and [Mr.] McCain to move forward on that. ... We'll do that"; and "We've got McCain and we've got a few others. I don't expect much of a fight at all." A report in The Cherry Hill Courier Post quotes a spokesman for the Senate Majority Leader "[Mr. Reid] plans to take up immigration reform but is still working with the new administration on timing ... House leaders also have promised to consider measures." As to when comprehensive immigration reform will come up before Congress, Immigration Daily has learnt that it will come to the floor early in 2009 though it is not currently planned for Mr. Obama's first 100 days. The Cherry Hill Courier Post quotes Sen. Menendez "If lawmakers don't consider the issue early, it could 'slide into midterms' -- the 2010 election -- and again become a contentious campaign issue. This is one of those issues that needs to be done early on."

    Sen. Menendez and Rep. Gutierrez are on the warpath for early passage of CIR in the 111th Congress. Sen. Menendez had the courage to singlehandedly block a five year extension of E-Verify, and will doubtless push for a significant immigration benefits downpayment before March 6th when E-Verify is set to expire. Rep. Gutierrez and the House Hispanic caucus successfully blocked immigration benefits legislation in the 110th Congress to ensure continued support for CIR. The election results have strenghthened the hand of CIR supporters in Congress. We believe that Sen. Menendez and Rep. Gutierrez are on the right track, and urge immigration advocates to support their efforts.





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias (Musician)
  • Enrique Iglesias (Musician)



  • tinku01
    07-17 10:29 AM
    My details-

    PD -June 2004, India
    I-140 - approved Feb, 2007
    CP applied - Aug, 2007



    more...


    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias Photos. bradc
  • Enrique Iglesias Photos. bradc



  • vxb2004
    10-25 08:42 PM
    USCIS is well behind updating the status online. My AP says "Pending", but I received an approval note from my attorney.





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias wallpaper
  • enrique iglesias wallpaper



  • clif
    06-07 10:03 AM
    You can change jobs. Make sure you (or your attorney) send the AC21 letter to USCIS before your employer revokes the approved I-140. If you do that, the revokation won't have much effect, otherwise you may get NOID (Notice of Intent to Deny).



    more...


    enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias photo
  • enrique iglesias photo



  • kk_kk
    02-03 06:51 PM
    I can say for sure, Canada PR is not going to work because I went through the same situation and I was not allowed to board British Airways flight in Hyderabad with Canada PR and US AP.

    I am still fighting with BA for getting an refund.

    I had to buy an emergency ticket on AI to get back to US because I could not get my vacation extended





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique-wallpapers/images-; enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique-wallpapers/images-. seashellz
  • enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique-wallpapers/images-; enrique iglesias wallpaper. enrique-wallpapers/images-. seashellz



  • krishmunn
    09-21 07:11 AM
    First thing you need to do is setup a 30 min - 1 hour appointment with an experienced Attorney (Khanna/ Murthy/ Ron) You can have a telephonic discussion. Do not think about money and go for the best.

    During discussion bring up the topic of new employment (C) as well .

    If you have the format from your current company attorney , show it to them .

    It might be simpler then you are thinking.



    more...


    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias Photos: Hot
  • Enrique Iglesias Photos: Hot



  • BharatPremi
    04-16 04:42 PM
    kaisersose, scorpioduo


    Thanks.





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique-Iglesias-Wallpaper
  • Enrique-Iglesias-Wallpaper



  • simple1
    09-16 04:19 PM
    If you are genuine: Don’t do it. It will affect your GC.

    If you are losers guild member using Indian name to post: Leave this forum immediately. I am tired of fake posts. I personally believe Riakapoor and ar7165 are fake.

    you can apply for UI - Unemployment insurance, NOT Unemployment benefit. The first is an insurance, the second a benefit that will impact your GC application.

    Hello All,

    I am on a dependent EAD. I lost my job (laid off) few days back. Can I enroll for unemplyment benefits as i am reading the threads that dependents can enroll into UB. But just want to make sure before going forward. We are on I-485 pending status.

    Please suggest.

    Thanks in Advance!

    My gc is in process, both I-140 and I-485 is approved over 180 days back. I have a valid EAD. Recently I lost my job (laid off). Can I apply for unemployment benefit?



    more...


    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias Wallpapers
  • Enrique Iglesias Wallpapers



  • amslonewolf
    05-22 12:03 PM
    I don't think the state dept is that naive. They already know what the demand would be. All they would have to do is just look at the approved I-140s and they a very reasonable estimate.





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias
  • Enrique Iglesias



  • sk.aggarwal
    11-11 08:03 PM
    I have never heard about this before, but if I were you I would:
    1. Immediately request transcripts from college in sealed envelope, exactly as requested.
    2. I dont think sending notarized copies will work, because notaries normally dont attest document, owner of the document does that and they just say that it is your signature. As per my understanding you will need to send the originals as requested. But with it you can safely send a letter asking them to send the documents back. Include a prepaid fedex envelop.

    Worst case, they will loose these documents but you can get them reissued from university. But if you dont send documents as requested your application could be denied.

    Its amazing the extent USCIS will go to make our lives tough



    more...


    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias - Alive
  • Enrique Iglesias - Alive



  • Blondygirl
    02-21 03:13 PM
    thank you everybody for your input! you have certainly helped me narrow down my searching!!!





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias Wallpapers.
  • Enrique Iglesias Wallpapers.



  • HOPE_GC_SOON
    08-05 11:47 AM
    Thanks Dealsnet;

    Do you have any clue on "ADIT Processing'. Do we have to do anything ?
    Any probable expectation that, Actual Plastic Cards, would be received within XX days of Welcome notices ?

    Just curious to know, if you have any info.. :)

    thanks,:)

    The sequence you mentioned is correct.
    I did received 3 same paper welcome notices !!!!
    Next paper notice received contain GC.





    enrique iglesias wallpaper. Enrique Iglesias
  • Enrique Iglesias



  • lacrossegc
    09-06 05:34 PM
    bkarnik , I agree ...but ABC USA and ABC Canada are two totally seperate companies for immigration/H1/GC purposes.

    When working in US --- ABC USA will have to pay US wages per H1B LCA, ABC Canada doesnt pay
    When working in Canada -- ABC USA pays nothing, ABC Canada pays

    Tax implications are complex :) but as far as I know, If taxes are being filed in US, Worldwide Income will have to be reported on the 1040 OR else file 1040 Non-Resident in which you can report only the US wages.

    !!! Ask a lawyer and a tax advisor !!!!! better be safe than sorry .... but I believe that the scenario described is justifiable and legal

    I believe that could be a problem. If your Company is paying you in Canada, but asking you to work in the US I am not sure if your H1 would be valid. Per my limited knowledge, H1 can be sponsored by an employer having a business in the US. I am sure this is an issue that is a clash between the tax laws and the immigration laws. I would request you to submit your question for the next attorney call and hopefully we get an clear answer.





    anilsal
    03-14 09:32 AM
    This topic seems to be gray for H1B holders. What is allowed and what is not.

    * What about cases where people submit content to magazines and are paid a small amount (if published)? It is kind of funny to tell them - "you know I won't accept your $200 bucks because I am on H1B and cannot accept anything else".





    Arjun
    03-15 11:32 AM
    I agree, I think you can recieve incentives, but you cannot work (as an employee) for a corporation other than the H1B sponsor. In any case, as long as you report all of your income you are fine. I do'nt think IRS checks your status to validate your income.


    H1-B folks are permitted to have sources of passive income from entities other than their H1 sponsor. This includes bank interests, stock dividends, profits from stock transactions etc. Most of these incomes are taxable and reported to the IRS on 1099-INT or 1099-DIV forms. When you open a bank account and get a bonus of, say $200, it is considered as interest earned.

    The vital point to remember, I guess, is that H1s are NOT allowed to generate an income from any source (other that H1 sponsor) that needs any tangible work to be done- investments do not count as tangible work.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment